Trinidad & Tobago Business News
SEE OTHER BRANDS

Exploring the business and economy news of Trinidad and Tobago

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors of aTyr, Marex, Cepton, and MoonLake to Contact the Firm About their Rights in Filed Class Action Lawsuits

NEW YORK, Oct. 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of aTyr Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR), Marex Group PLC (NASDAQ:MRX), Cepton, Inc. (NASDAQ:CPTN), and MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (NASDAQ:MLTX). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided.

aTyr Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR)

  • Class Period: January 16, 2025 to September 12, 2025
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 8, 2025
  • The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors regarding the efficacy of Efzofitimod; (2) At the same time, Defendants disseminated false and misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the drug's actual capability-particularly its ability to enable patients to completely taper their steroid usage; and (3) As a result of these omissions and misrepresentations, Plaintiff and other shareholders purchased aTyr's securities at artificially inflated prices.

Marex Group PLC (NASDAQ:MRX)

  • Class Period: May 16, 2024 to August 5, 2025
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 8, 2025
  • The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company sold over-the-counter financial instruments to itself; (2) Marex had inconsistencies in its financial statements between its subsidiaries and related parties, including as to intercompany receivables and loans; (3) as a result of the foregoing, Marex’s financial statements could not be relied upon; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (NASDAQ:MLTX)

  • Class Period: March 10, 2024 to September 29, 2025
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 15, 2025
  • The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company’s procedures and policies regarding tooling and equipment maintenance in its Tyman Mexico facility were significantly “underinvested”; (2) as a result, the Company’s tooling and equipment conditions had significantly degraded to near “catastrophic” levels; (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company was likely to incur significant costs, “pushing out the timing” of expected benefits from the Tyman integration; (4) that Quanex had previously identified the foregoing issues; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Cepton, Inc. (NASDAQ:CPTN)

  • Class Period: July 29, 2024 to January 6, 2025
  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 8, 2025
  • According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Defendants engaged in tax fraud; (2) Defendants committed bribery to cover up the fact that they committed tax fraud; (3) as a result, defendants understated the legal risk facing the company; and (4) as a result, defendants’ statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn and X.

Contact Information:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Marion Passmore, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
investigations@bespc.com
www.bespc.com


Primary Logo

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Share us

on your social networks:
AGPs

Get the latest news on this topic.

SIGN UP FOR FREE TODAY

No Thanks

By signing to this email alert, you
agree to our Terms & Conditions